Skip to main content
Solved

Field ID not found by mutation, but field ID is correct...what could be happening?


jorden-monroe
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi Pipefy team, I am automatically assigning assignee fields using a webhook target and most of the mutations work just fine except for one field (“Manager Assignee”). Here is the error message from my function. 

and here is the data I get back when I query the phase fields in our pipe.

So clearly the field ID is correct. Why is it not recognizing this field? 

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

Best answer by giovana-valadao

Hey, it seems to me there’s a little typo in your field id. The field id is “manager_assingee” and you are using “manager_assignee” (notice the difference in the “assignee” word). Could you check please if that is the issue?

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

3 replies

giovana-valadao
Pipefy Staff

Hey, it seems to me there’s a little typo in your field id. The field id is “manager_assingee” and you are using “manager_assignee” (notice the difference in the “assignee” word). Could you check please if that is the issue?


jorden-monroe
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • New Participant
  • 18 replies
  • May 17, 2024

@giovana-valadao WOW I glossed over that 50 times my eyes are playing tricks on me! Needed a fresh pair thank you!


giovana-valadao
Pipefy Staff

It happens to all of us! Not a problem 😆


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings