Skip to main content
Solved

Field ID not found by mutation, but field ID is correct...what could be happening?

  • May 17, 2024
  • 3 replies
  • 235 views

jorden-monroe
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi Pipefy team, I am automatically assigning assignee fields using a webhook target and most of the mutations work just fine except for one field (“Manager Assignee”). Here is the error message from my function. 

and here is the data I get back when I query the phase fields in our pipe.

So clearly the field ID is correct. Why is it not recognizing this field? 

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

Best answer by giovana-valadao

Hey, it seems to me there’s a little typo in your field id. The field id is “manager_assingee” and you are using “manager_assignee” (notice the difference in the “assignee” word). Could you check please if that is the issue?

3 replies

giovana-valadao
Pipefy Staff
  • Pipefy Staff
  • 16 replies
  • Answer
  • May 17, 2024

Hey, it seems to me there’s a little typo in your field id. The field id is “manager_assingee” and you are using “manager_assignee” (notice the difference in the “assignee” word). Could you check please if that is the issue?


jorden-monroe
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Inspiring
  • 18 replies
  • May 17, 2024

@giovana-valadao WOW I glossed over that 50 times my eyes are playing tricks on me! Needed a fresh pair thank you!


giovana-valadao
Pipefy Staff

It happens to all of us! Not a problem 😆